Nations split on how to cut plastic pollution after week of UN talks

About 170 international locations have been locked in tense negotiations over how one can cut back plastic air pollution after every week of UN talks in Paris surrounded by a frenzy of business lobbying.

Negotiators have agreed to develop a primary draft of a treaty to scale back plastic air pollution however there are nonetheless divisions over points similar to whether or not the foundations might be legally binding and whether or not they’ll restrict petrochemical firms’ manufacturing of latest plastic supplies.

A gaggle of 130 international locations, together with Mexico, Canada, New Zealand and most of Europe, need binding guidelines. However fossil gas producing international locations such because the US, Russia and China desire a much less bold, voluntary system during which international locations are free to ascertain their very own frameworks. 

Capping new manufacturing can be a blow to the petrochemical business, which is rising extra reliant on rising demand for plastic in rising economies because the world strikes away from fossil fuels.

A coalition of companies has backed the stricter strategy, together with a few of the world’s greatest client teams similar to Unilever, Nestlé and PepsiCo, in addition to retailers and packaging makers. On the talks, they campaigned for standardised guidelines to handle the complete lifecycle of plastics, together with lowering manufacturing, reuse and recycling, and the phasing out of dangerous chemical compounds.

Jodie Roussell, senior public affairs supervisor for packaging and sustainability at Nestlé, mentioned {that a} legally binding settlement with harmonised guidelines was vital. “Companies recognise that bold objectives and aspirations to finish plastic air pollution in a treaty have little worth on their very own,” she mentioned on Saturday. 

A binding treaty was required to offer “regulatory predictability”, mentioned Anke Boykin, senior director of worldwide environmental coverage at PepsiCo

However Emma Priestland from Break Free From Plastic mentioned: “We perceive companies want harmonised guidelines and that’s the perfect scenario for them, however we aren’t seeing them make a lot change of their enterprise fashions now.”

Coca-Cola, PepsiCo, Nestlé, Mondelēz and Unilever are the businesses that produce probably the most plastic air pollution, based on non-profit organisation Break Free from Plastic.

Trade representatives lobbied closely on the Paris negotiations © REUTERS

The American Chemistry Council (ACC), an business physique representing the petrochemical sector, argued for options that might not require lowered manufacturing, similar to waste administration and recycling.

The ACC known as for technological options similar to chemical recycling, and emphasised the necessity for the continued use of plastic supplies in aerospace, transport and medical purposes.

“We’ve heard a variety of speak this week about capping manufacturing however we’ve additionally heard a variety of speak from governments concerning the function of plastics to realize society’s objectives,” mentioned Stew Harris, ACC senior director of worldwide plastics coverage.

Campaigners warned that lobbying by the petrochemical business may end in a watered down treaty.

Greenpeace USA’s Graham Forbes mentioned: “The overarching danger is that this treaty turns into a waste administration treaty.”

Negotiations on the substance of the treaty solely started on day three of the Paris session, after Saudi Arabia, Russia and China objected to the treaty being agreed by majority vote, reasonably than by consensus. Consensus would imply that international locations may veto its adoption.

The primary draft of the treaty is because of be produced by November, and international locations may have till the top of subsequent yr to settle the ultimate phrases.

Local weather Capital

The place local weather change meets enterprise, markets and politics. Discover the FT’s protection right here.

Are you interested by the FT’s environmental sustainability commitments? Discover out extra about our science-based targets right here

Back To Top